SOCIALIST UNITY

8 March, 2010

TOWARDS ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY

Filed under: Economics — admin @ 10:00 am

By Jon Cruddas and Jonathan Rutherford

In the wake of the financial crash, the left has to create a new model of the individual living in society. But what now is the ethical relationship of individuals to one another and to society?

The centre left has to refashion a politics that values the social goods that give meaning to people’s lives: home, family, friendships, good work, locality, and communities of belonging, imaginary or otherwise. In our affirmation of ordinary everyday life we can rediscover the common good. This understanding of the interdependency of individuals, and acknowledgment of the social nature of individual life, recognises that people increasingly see themselves as individuals, and seek individual fulfilment, but also understands that individuality can only flourish in a social environment. And this way of looking at the relationship between society and the individual - which is part of a long tradition on the left - is helpful to us now in rethinking these relationships.

Leonard Hobhouse, a leading New Liberal thinker, wrote in Social Evolution and Political Theory:

“Society exists in individuals. When all the generations through which its unity subsists are counted in, its life is their life, and nothing outside their life”

Like Marx, for whom the individual was a category of relations, Hobhouse described ‘man’ as “the meeting point of a great number of social relations”. He argued that a progressive movement must have an ethical ideal. One element of this ideal must be liberty, but it must find a synthesis with equality, “since it stands for the truth that there is a common humanity deeper than all our superficial distinctions.” For Hobhouse, social progress is the development of a society in which “the best life of each man is, and is felt to be, bound up with the best life of his fellow-citizens”.

New Liberal thinkers such as Hobhouse were the pioneers of the British tradition of ethical socialism, which addresses the material conditions which give form to individual being. It is a politics of equality founded in the belief that individuals are of equal worth and it is governed by the ethic of reciprocity: do not do to others what you would not like to be done to you. It recognises that the task of living necessitates inter-dependency with others, and that this inter-dependency leads to the question of equality and justice.

Equality is the ethical core of justice. It is also the precondition for freedom. Not simply the negative freedom from the compulsion of others, or the freedom achieved through a fair distribution of resources, but a positive freedom toward self-fulfilment.

Ethical socialism must animate radical change in the organisation of the economy and its relations of control and ownership. Alongside a critique of the current financial system and its structuring effects on our lives, we need to think about the economy from the perspective of human needs. Britain has to make the transition from casino capitalism to a low-carbon, more equitable and balanced form of economic development.

The transition demands an economics whose principles are sustainable wealth creation, durability, recycling, cultural inventiveness, equality and human flourishing. The fundamental logic of this new economy must be ecological sustainability.

Climate change, peak oil and the need for energy and food security are all core green issues that will lie at its heart. Social movements, single issue campaigns and civil society organisations will be essential to this process, but they are not enough. A plural politics of alliances capable of achieving transformative economic and political change requires a theoretical and philosophical grounding and coherence. Only by developing our traditions of socialism and social liberalism, in conversation with newer traditions, particularly green politics and a politics that recognises cultural difference, will we be able to build a new hegemonic politics.

The coming election is the endgame of an old era. Whether Labour remains in government or returns to opposition, we need a fundamental re-assessment of its identity. Nothing is guaranteed, but the opportunities for a more ethical politics and economy are real. In the years ahead, the goals of a centre left are a strong, responsive and plural democracy, a restoration of trust and reciprocity in public life, and an ethical and ecologically sustainable economy for social justice and equality.

The unabridged version of this article is published in Soundings issue 44, Spring 2010. 

8 Comments »

  1. Brilliant to here a labour MP coming out with these views. It is really refreshing. Being a Dagenham resident I am seriously concerned about the threat of the BNP. Perhaps if the views of John Cruddas where known more widely in the bourough we would not face the problems we currently do. On that note, not sure if anyone else on here got today’s email from the Hope not Hate campaign regarding a new publication. I just donated and would encourage others to do so as well. Unison are doubling every donation!!!

    http://action.hopenothate.org.uk/DoubleDonation

    Comment by Joe Mulhall — 8 March, 2010 @ 11:10 am

  2. All very good and welcome but I think Britains place in the world market needs to be expanded, what goes on there will affect many issues here.

    Comment by SteveH — 8 March, 2010 @ 11:36 am

  3. This version of ethical socialism seems to resemble communitarianism (Sandel, MacIntyre, Talyor) more than classical Christian socialism. That is its reference to ” inter-dependency leads to the question of equality and justice.” is a lot better than Maurice and Kingsley’s beleif in purely ethical equality. Though ideas about social ownership remain vague to say the least. As are the references to equality and social justice.

    For where communitarian thinkers’ ideas on social justice - gaining influence in the dying days of New Labour - lead see the just posted:

    http://tendancecoatesy.wordpress.com/2010/03/08/against-communitarianism/

    Comment by Andrew Coates — 8 March, 2010 @ 12:31 pm

  4. This version of ethical socialism seems to resemble communitarianism (Sandel, MacIntyre, Talyor) more than classical Christian socialism. That is its reference to ” inter-dependency leads to the question of equality and justice.” is a lot better than Maurice and Kingsley’s beleif in purely ethical equality. Though ideas about social ownership remain vague to say the least. As are the references to equality and social justice.

    For where communitarian thinkers’ ideas on social justice - gaining influence in the dying days of New Labour - lead see the just posted:

    http://tendancecoatesy.wordpress.com/2010/03/08/against-communitarianism/

    Comment by Andrew Coates — 8 March, 2010 @ 12:31 pm

  5. This version of ethical socialism seems to resemble communitarianism (Sandel, MacIntyre, Talyor) more than classical Christian socialism. That is its reference to ” inter-dependency leads to the question of equality and justice.” is a lot better than Maurice and Kingsley’s belief in purely ethical equality. Though ideas about social ownership remain vague to say the least. As are the references to equality and social justice.

    For where communitarian thinkers’ ideas on social justice - gaining influence in the dying days of New Labour - lead see the just posted:

    http://tendancecoatesy.wordpress.com/2010/03/08/against-communitarianism/

    Comment by Andrew Coates — 8 March, 2010 @ 12:31 pm

  6. Sorry about duplicates, machine here playing up. Please remove them.

    Comment by Andrew Coates — 8 March, 2010 @ 12:35 pm

  7. #1 I wouldn’t recommend that people donate to Hope Not Hate. Searchlight are Zionists (unlikely to endear them to most SU readers) and therefore don’t like Muslims organising politically or making genuine alliances with their communities.

    Muslims however are the main target for racists nowadays because of imperialism’s ongoing oil-grab in the Middle East. This is why Searchlight/HNH is unable to oppose fascism effectively.

    Comment by little black sister — 8 March, 2010 @ 4:42 pm

  8. seems a bit low on content.

    Comment by Derek Wall — 8 March, 2010 @ 9:14 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress