SOCIALIST UNITY

18 December, 2009

COPENHAGEN SHOWS NORTH SOUTH DIVIDE

Filed under: Ken Livingstone, climate change — admin @ 9:00 am

By Ken Livingstone

The palpable anger of the world’s poorer nations over the wholly inadequate ambition of western governments’ commitment to tackling climate change has probably been the strongest message to emerge from Copenhagen, as the UN climate change talks enter their final week. The poorest nations on Earth are already feeling the devastating effects of more extreme monsoons, droughts and loss of glacial water. Failure at Copenhagen will be tantamount to abandoning them.

With rich countries knowingly committing to less than half the emissions cuts needed and nowhere near the financial support required to deliver new renewable energy infrastructure in the global South, the Sudanese chair of the G77 group of developing countries Lumumba Di-Aping, called a 2C rise in temperature a “suicide pact” for Africa.

Important political progress has been made over the last two years - most notably the election by the world’s largest economy of a President who understands the scientific reality of climate change. But, as ‘The Copenhagen Diagnosis’, an excellent summary of global warming by a collection of leading climate scientists, points out: “Global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel burning in 2008 were 40% higher than those in 1990 (the base year for the original Kyoto Treaty)”.

The UK’s leading climate research group, The Tyndall Centre, argues that to have as much as a 50:50 chance of avoiding an average two degree rise in the Earth’s temperature (the ‘tipping point’ after which global warming is thought to be irreversible and catastrophic) then emissions in the world’s richest nations have to start declining by 2012, and achieve at least a 60 per cent reduction in emissions from energy by 2020. The best that the United States could offer this month is to cut its emissions by four per cent by 2020. Europe has been playing a better role – pledging a twenty per cent cut by 2020. But even this is not enough.

A fair, ambitious and binding deal at Copenhagen is a prerequisite for the enormous effort that will be required across the globe to avert catastrophic climate change. But even Kyoto II will be meaningless without domestic commitment in the world’s richest countries. After the delegates head home on Saturday morning, the real task will be to show the political leadership needed to drive down emissions and seize the benefits of taking a low carbon efficient path to recovery from recession.

The outcomes of the Copenhagen talks will be among the issues discussed at the Progressive London conference on 30, January, 2010. Sessions include ”After Copenhagen - turning the tide on Climate Change”. Speakers at the conference include Eugenie Harvey - Director 10:10; Serge Lourie - Leader LB Richmond Upon Thames and Green Party Assembly Members Jenny Jones and Darren Johnson. 

Click here to register for the conference.

FROM PROGRESSIVE LONDON

4 Comments »

  1. Hmm

    The problem here is the the CRU at EAST Anglia are, well, in a tiny bit of bother

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017393/climategate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/

    AGW looks like well a lot of hot air

    Comment by Vof H — 18 December, 2009 @ 12:40 pm

  2. #1 You daft twat. That has got to be the stupidest article ever cited on this website. Perhaps we should call you a complete delingpole.

    The real climate scandal here: http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2009/12/07/the-real-climate-scandal/

    Comment by Strategist — 18 December, 2009 @ 1:32 pm

  3. Readers might be interested in coverage of the left interventions at COP15 at http://links.org.au/taxonomy/term/433

    Comment by Terry Townsend — 19 December, 2009 @ 7:30 am

  4. Can Turning the tide on climate change eqaul to Going back to nature?

    The above initiative rings me bell since “Turning the Tide” on climate change is precisely the tittle of a book recently written by Professor Kandel on the solutions to be implemented to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (see: http://sendit.cefic.org/DMZ/DownLoad.aspx?UID=e4a3fb41-082a-452b-8fc3-1fe70bef6ff5 ).

    But this book goes beyond the traditional opposition North/South.

    Of course, Robert Kandel recognises that the South needs much more technology to tackle climate change since its current carbon intensity is huge. However, there are exising technologies available in the world that consumers, including the ones of the developped world, should use more widely. A lot of them are related to energy efficiency, all show big CO2 savings when being analyzed during their whole life cycle.

    I would say that Turning the Tide on Climate change (to be viewed at http://www.cefic.org/files/publications/Book-climate-change/) is a book for a non specialist audience wishing to go beyond giving swimming lessons to polar bears in the ice that melts because of cmimate change, wishing then to act in a more sustainable way in concrete areas like housing, food, clothing…

    Comment by Philippe de Casabianca — 7 January, 2010 @ 10:48 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress